All the questions see: “Network the quantity one greatest means just how most likely their attitude to your homosexuals is comparable to the brand new thinking the majority of your [ male / girls ] household members provides on the homosexuals.” Each other concerns was in fact replied using a 5-part size between 0 (Nothing at all) in order to cuatro (Much). Early in the day research has receive these products so you’re able to echo respondents’ normative thinking into the gay somebody (Herek & Capitanio, 1996). These materials showed a great Cronbach’s ? out of .70.
Religiosity
I measured religiosity having fun with five activities: (a) significance of spiritual or religious thinking; (b) volume out-of chapel otherwise temple attendance previously year; (c) frequency so you’re able to occurrences backed by its spiritual classification previously year; and you will (d) prayer volume prior to now few days. Need for religious philosophy try counted playing with a good cuatro-part measure between step one (Maybe not very important after all) so you can 4 (Essential). The item computing participants’ attendance so you’re able to a chapel otherwise temple in during the last 12 months see, “How many times have you ever attended a chapel or forehead from the past year?” Professionals answered which because of the choosing one of several following half dozen kinds: Never, A few times annually, Several times per year, Once or twice 30 days, Regular, and more than once a week. The newest half dozen address classes having church attendance have been as well as used for attendance to help you sponsored spiritual events. Prayer frequency was reviewed that have half dozen classes: Never ever, A few times thirty days, A few times a month, A couple of moments per week, Once a day, or higher than daily. Almost every other studies have put comparable tips away from religiosity in their questionnaires and found them to become continuously reputable (Herek & Gonzalez-Rivera, in press). Religiosity factors had a Cronbach’s ? from .80 within investigation.
Attitudes to your Lesbians and you will Gays
The very last section of the questionnaire integrated the latest Foreign-language-translation of your brand-new types of the fresh new Thinking On Lesbians and Gay (ATLG) Scale (Herek, 1984). This 20-items size try answered using a 5-area scale ranging from step 1 (Highly differ) to 5 (Firmly consent). Respondents’ rating are determined by using the newest mean round the issues including you to definitely higher results reflect significantly more negative perceptions for the homosexual guys and you will lady. With its brand spanking new version, the dimensions is divided in to one or two 10-product subscales: the fresh Thinking for the Lesbians (ATL) in addition to Attitudes for the Gays (ATG) subscales. I translated brand new ATLG size to your Language-language after which right back translated out of Foreign language for the English to be certain equivalency between the two items. Spanish-talking Puerto Rican people, exactly who volunteered in a good pre-test pilot study, sensed making use of vocabulary compatible. Foreign-language and you will English sizes of one’s items’ blogs can be acquired in the Appendix An excellent.
Exploratory principle axis factor analyses that have oblique rotation of one’s Spanish kind of the fresh new ATLG Size got three products: an effective Condemnation-Endurance Grounds (17 items; %), a self-Expressive Factor (one to product; 6.75%), and you will a prices Foundation (a couple of activities; 6.51%). These about three areas informed me sixty.9% of your own full variance. The informed me difference ones issues was nearly the same as men and women received for the Herek’s (1984) new analysis. Pursuing the Herek’s (1984) testimonial, i chosen the items packing higher just for the role matrix of one’s Condemnation-Endurance foundation. Just after removing step 3 situations (activities dos, eight, 12), i decided to including eradicate an extra item (item 17) as it decreased the fresh scale’s reliability considerably. The latest ATLG measure concluded that have 16-points and you will explained 55% of one’s full variance. The object loadings for three factors is actually demonstrated inside Desk step 1 .
Dining table step one
Herek’s ATLG Scale might have been given in almost any racial teams through the the usa with uniform Cronbach’s leader coefficients higher than .87 (Herek, 2000). Just like the measure got never been used for good Puerto Rican try, the fresh ATLG-Language type exhibited precision results (?=.93) the same as men and women received by the Herek from inside the an undergraduate try (Herek, 1996). To decrease the fresh new inflation of Cronbach’s leader accuracy coefficient owed towards the level of situations, i parceled new sixteen factors towards the four ingredient ratings. For every single rating illustrated the fresh imply well worth for each four-item ATL and ATG sign, correspondingly. Approach keeping factors from the its rating purchased basis loadings were accustomed through the symptoms to the ATG and you can ATL indicators, correspondingly. minichat All four-items evidence had good .90 Cronbach’s alpha coefficient.
Нет Ответов