When it comes to aspect out of personal jealousy, on the forty thinking-report tools was in fact claimed while the creation of the Self-Statement and you may Projective Jealousy Bills (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Many tool were utilized only when. , 1992) designed to determine intercourse differences; the latest Multidimensional Jealousy Measure (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) created to gauge the three size of jealousy (intellectual, mental and you may behavioral proportions); the Facebook Envy Measure (Muise, Christofides, & Des) geared towards contrasting the chances of a meeting that triggers feelings regarding envy professionals related to its passion toward Myspace; this new Jealousy Size (Buunk, 1997), regularly examine about three style of jealousy (reactive, nervous and you may precautionary) plus the Social Envy Size (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and that assesses this new negative emotion as a consequence of genuine otherwise threatened losses off a liked individual an opponent.
In Brazil, the latest Romantic Jealousy Catalog is revised (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) As for Colombia, there aren’t any psychometric knowledge out-of a specific size toward romantic jealousy
On Latin-american context, there can be a version when you look at the Chile of your Inventory out of Behavior of the Couple That can cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). In Mexico, a beneficial Multidimensional Way of measuring Jealousy (Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and you will a short studies try completed with the new Multidimensional Collection out of Intimate Jealousy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). Concurrently, earlier degree don’t perform Factorial Confirmatory Analysis (CFA) in order to corroborate new grounds framework located, and you will lowest reliability levels was included in the activities (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or short examples were utilized (Mota ainsi que al., 2016).
The IJS create having Mathes and you can Severa (1981) the most utilized scales having researching close jealousy, it discovered six things one to evaluate the awareness so you’re able to risks associated to: (a) Partner’s infidelity and you may relationships anybody else (affairs step 1, step 3, a dozen, 14, fifteen, sixteen, 20, twenty two, 23, and you will 25); (b) Lover’s popularity (circumstances dos, step three, cuatro, eight, 10, 13, 17, 20, and you may 23); (c) An untrustworthy companion (circumstances step one, 4, 6, 19, and you will 21); (d) Partner’s dated dates (activities 11, 24, twenty six, 27, and you may twenty-eight); (e) Partner’s apathy (facts 8, nine and you may twenty-four); and you may (f) Lover’s remaining nearest and dearest which have old dates and you may gender variations (things 5 and 18).
All of the devices in the list above have demostrated sufficient amounts of authenticity and you may accuracy
You will find four knowledge with checked-out with respect to their precision and you may validity. Mathes and you can Severa (1981) introduce a couple of education, therefore the first analysis performed the development of your size with 39 products, that was smaller to twenty eight activities immediately following mathematical research. Next, in the the next investigation, IJS was used next to most other bills that evaluated intimate like-hyperlinks, insecurity, self-admiration and you may an ad hoc questionnaire of independent identities, guaranteeing datingmentor.org/dating-over-60/, based on concept, the advanced level from jealousy, the better the amount of Personal love while the lesser new independent name of couples. Inside research, i declaration an excellent coefficient away from precision out-of .ninety five into the overall size. When you look at the a 3rd study, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you will Manhood (1982), in order to expand the brand new indicators regarding validity, used the IJS and two behavioral procedures: (a) possibility whenever met with an opponent and (b) terms of possessiveness towards companion, by way of a telephone call that they designed to the person who took part in the study. The expected correlations had been received, and therefore again offered the new legitimacy of the size. Finally, from inside the a 4th research, Mathes, Roter and you will Joerger (1982) substantiated the new convergent validity from IJS along with other bills one evaluated personal jealousy.
Нет Ответов