Upon to arrive toward lab, members done authored advised agree. Members was in fact seated from the a pc and you can asked to accomplish an effective questionnaire, including an assessment off identification and you will concerns examining intimate spouse compatibility. As in the last education, grandiose narcissism are reviewed toward Narcissistic Character Directory (NPI ? = .86, Yards = , SD = eight.20) and you can Large Four characteristics towards Huge Four Collection (BFI) . To possess neuroticism, ? = .82; M = 2.77, SD = 0.80; to own extraversion, ? = .84, Yards = step 3.46, SD = 0.72; for visibility to try out, ? = .75, M = step three.55, SD = 0.58; to have conscientiousness, ? = .76; Meters = step 3.67, SD = 0.56; and agreeableness, ? = .73, Yards = 3.97, SD = 0.51.
That it survey was not utilized for analysis because it are part of your defense story. Players was in fact advised your suggestions they offered could be used to complement them with people into campus who may have comparable appeal. Eventually, intercourse, age, and matchmaking condition was in fact assessed.
Adopting the processes in depth because of the Parker and you can Burkley , members was basically second found an image of a target individual and you may told one to predicated on their prior responses, he has got “similar appeal” with this particular address. The ladies seen an image of the male address as well as the boys viewed a picture of a female address. This type of pictures was indeed pre-checked of the an excellent ple for their quantity of elegance having fun with good 10-area scale, in a fashion that 1 = really unappealing and 10 = really attractive. This new mean get into male photos are six.62 (SD = step one.86) and suggest score for girls photographs are seven.03 (SD = step one.29). Particularly Parker and you can Burkley, i and requested users a number of questions regarding brand new participant’s interest in the goal, but all of our based parameters had been only the products that analyzed companion poaching especially. dating for Rate My Date adults Answers were made to your 5-area balances in a way that step 1 = very unlikely and you can 5 = more than likely. Those things were an excellent) “Just how probably are you willing to become to follow this individual to possess an effective relationship?” (M = 2.43, SD = step 1.28), and b) “Just how most likely would you end up being to make out using this private?” (M = dos.38, SD = 1.34). We together with reviewed the brand new the quantity that brand new participant discover the brand new target attractive playing with a beneficial 5-area scale in a way that 1 = most unappealing and you may 5 = really glamorous (Yards = 3.76, SD = 1.15).
Abilities
I basic situated the details ahead of measuring analyses. We next calculated correlations between predictor/control variables (the top Five details) and you may benefit variables, being exhibited from inside the Desk 6. Grandiose narcissism is synchronised that have an increased likelihood of kissing towards the address, although not that have picking out the address attractive otherwise pursuing the target to have a romance.
People was indeed randomly assigned to a conclusion of address since “single” or “in the a love” and you can was following requested for taking a preliminary questionnaire with the amount of interest they have in the address
I following inserted details on the a beneficial regression design; number 1 details out of participants’ relationships condition, target relationships status, sex, and you may NPI scores had been registered toward Step one (dealing with to own Larger Five parameters), the a few-method relations among top variables were joined to your Step two, all of the around three-way affairs one of first details had been joined toward Step 3, plus the four-method interaction certainly one of number 1 details try entered towards the Step. As nothing of your five-method connections hit statistical relevance, 3 analyses was reported from inside the Dining table eight.
For finding the prospective glamorous, only fundamental outcomes to own sex and you can an excellent participants’ relationship status have been high. Males was indeed prone to discover address attractive than female, and you can men and women was indeed prone to get the address glamorous than simply affixed somebody. Grandiose narcissism was not good predictor to find the mark glamorous as a whole (? = -.067, t = -0.913, p = .362) and you can grandiose narcissists don’t discover attached goals much more attractive than simply unattached objectives (? = -.052, t = -0.842, p = .401).
Нет Ответов